Role of statins in clinical evolution of octogenarian patients admitted due to COVID-19. / Papel de las estatinas en la evolución clínica de los pacientes octogenarios ingresados por COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes high mortality in elderly patients. Some studies have shown a benefit of statin treatment in the evolution of this disease. Since there are no similar publications in this population group, the aim of this study is to analyze in-hospital mortality in relation to preadmission treatment with statins in an exclusively elderly population of octogenarian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed including a total of 258 patients ≥80 years with hospital admission for confirmed COVID-19 between March 1 and May 31, 2020. They were divided into two groups: taking statins prior to admission (n=129) or not (n=129). RESULTS: In-hospital mortality due to COVID-19 in patients ≥80 years (86.13±4.40) during the first wave was 35.7% (95% CI: 30.1-41.7%). Mortality in patients previously taking statins was 25.6% while in those not taking statins was 45.7%. Female sex (RR 0.62 [0.44-0.89]; p=0.008), diabetes (RR 0.61 [0.41-0.92]; p=0.017) and pre-admission treatment with statins (RR 0.58 95% CI [0.41-0.83]; p=0.003) were associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Severe lung involvement was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (RR 1.45 95% CI [1.04-2.03]; p=0.028). Hypertension, obesity, age, cardiovascular disease and a higher Charlson index did not, however, show influence on in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In octogenarian patients treated with statins prior to admission for COVID-19 in the first wave, lower in-hospital mortality was observed.

Effectiveness of antithrombotic prophylaxis in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic prophylaxis in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 acute infection has increased. Currently, most of the evidence relates to patients in intensive care units; however, there is little information on patients admitted to hospital wards and there is no consensus protocol on thromboprophylaxis during admission and after discharge. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients admitted with COVID-19 and 30 days after discharge. METHOD: A prospective observational study was conducted of patients admitted with COVID-19 in which the hospital thromboprophylaxis protocol was applied, classifying the patients as having a standard or high risk of thrombosis. Pharmacists performed a daily follow-up and actively intervened during admission and at discharge. The main outcome measure was the global incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) related to hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included, 98.23% of whom were admitted to a hospital ward. The incidence of hospital-acquired VTE was 1.77%. In 75.22% of the subjects, thromboprophylaxis was adjusted to the protocol during admission. A total of 23 pharmaceutical interventions were conducted, with an adherence of 52.17%. At discharge, 94.28% of the patients who had no haemorrhage and ≥4 points on the Padua Prediction Score required thromboprophylaxis, aligning with the protocol. The global incidence of haemorrhagic events during the follow-up period was 0.88%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of hospital-acquired VTE was lower than that described in the literature. Although it cannot be certain that it is directly related to the instituted protocol, the data can show that the management of prevention of VTE is being optimally performed at the hospital. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the incidence after discharge, as well as to agree on a specific protocol in the COVID-19 population for the prevention of these events during hospitalisation and post-discharge.

[Prognostic impact of prior cardiopathy in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia]. / Repercusión pronóstica de cardiopatía previa en pacientes hospitalizados con neumonía por COVID-19.

Objective: From the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, the presence of previous cardiopathy was thought to be related with a worse prognosis of the disease. We aimed to analyse that theoretical adverse impact in a large cohort of patients. Method: We selected 1065 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between March and June 2020, divided in three groups according to (1) absence of cardiopathy, (2) presence of valvular heart disease or ischemic heart disease, or (3) presence of heart failure. We analysed the differences between groups regarding the need for admission in intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation or mortality during admission, or mortality during admission or in the next 6 months. Results: The factors that were associated with a worse prognosis both in acute phase and in the next 6 months were age, male gender, obesity and oncologic disease. The presence of previous cardiopathy did not have an adverse prognostic impact neither initially nor in the short term, in our study. Conclusions: We did not obtain significative association of the presence of cardiopathy with a worse medical evolution, neither in acute phase nor in the short term, of patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Objetivo: Desde el inicio de la pandemia por enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) se relacionó la presencia de cardiopatía previa con un peor pronóstico de la enfermedad. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar esa posible repercusión desfavorable en una cohorte amplia de pacientes. Método: Se incluyeron 1,065 pacientes ingresados con neumonía por coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) entre marzo y junio de 2020, divididos en tres grupos, según no tuvieran cardiopatía previa (grupo 1), presentaran cardiopatía valvular o isquémica (grupo 2) o tuvieran insuficiencia cardiaca (grupo 3). Se analizaron las diferencias entre los grupos en cuanto a necesidad de ingreso en unidad de cuidados intensivos para ventilación mecánica o mortalidad durante el ingreso, o mortalidad durante el ingreso o a los seis meses. Resultados: Los factores que se asociaron con un peor pronóstico inicial y a los seis meses fueron la edad, el sexo masculino, la obesidad y la presencia de patología oncológica, sin que la presencia de cardiopatía supusiera una influencia pronóstica negativa inicial ni a corto plazo en nuestro trabajo. Conclusiones: No obtuvimos asociación significativa de la presencia de cardiopatía por si sola con una peor evolución en fase aguda ni a corto plazo de pacientes ingresados con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2.

Management of Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the management of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with secondary immunosuppression due to either an underlying hematological disease or to the effects of immunochemotherapy (ICT). Some of them may present persistent infection with multiple relapses of COVID-19, requiring several admissions. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes after treatment of 5 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), previously treated with ICT, who developed several episodes of COVID-19. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical evolution and response to treatment with antiviral agent, steroids, and convalescent plasma in 5 patients with FL and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) persistent infection. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction tests and peripheral blood immunophenotype were performed for all patients. RESULTS: All patients required hospitalization due to pneumonia with severity criteria and were re-admitted after a median of 22 days (13-42) from the previous discharge. They all showed B-cell depletion by immunophenotyping, and no traces of immunoglobulin antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in any of the cases. The survival rate was 80%. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy evidenced clinical benefits, demonstrating its capacity to control infection in immunosuppressed FL patients treated with ICT.

Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on the severity of COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The TMPRSS2 protein has been involved in severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The production is regulated by the androgen receptor (AR). It is speculated that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may protect patients affected by prostate cancer (PC) from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients treated for COVID-19 in our institution who had a previous diagnosis of PC. We analyzed the influence of exposure of ADT on the presence of severe course of COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 2280 patients were treated in our center for COVID-19 with a worse course of disease in males (higher rates of hospitalization, intense care unit [ICU] admission, and death). Out of 1349 subjects registered in our PC database, 156 were on ADT and 1193 were not. Out of those, 61 (4.52%) PC patients suffered from COVID-19, 11 (18.0%) belonged to the ADT group, and 50 (82.0%) to the non-ADT group. Regarding the influence of ADT on the course of the disease, statistically significant differences were found neither in the death rate (27.3% vs. 34%; p = 0.481), nor in the presence of severe COVID-19: need for intubation or ICU admission (0% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.561) and need for corticoid treatment, interferon beta, or tocilizumab (60% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.128). Multivariate analysis adjusted for clinically relevant comorbidities did not find that ADT was a protective factor for worse clinical evolution (risk ratio [RR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.83; p = 0.77) or death (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.26-1.74; p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that COVID-19 is more severe in men. However, the use of ADT in patients with PC was not shown to prevent the risk of severe COVID-19.

Impact of Previous Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Immune Response After a Single Dose of BNT162b2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine.

Immune response after a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine was markedly increased in subjects with previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, reaching similar immunoglobulin titers to those elicited by the full 2 doses in naive cases, and increased modestly after the second dose. These data may inform the priority of the boosting dose.

SARS-CoV-2 new infections among health-care workers after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. A hospital-wide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of mRNA severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination on the incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections in health-care workers (HCW). METHODS: The evolution of the incident rate of microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of 2590 HCW after BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, compared with the rate in the community (n = 170 513) was evaluated by mixed Poisson regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1820 HCW (70.3% of total) received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine between 10 January and 16 January 2021, and 296 (11.4%) received it the following week. All of them completed vaccination 3 weeks later. Incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine declined by 71% (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 0.286, 95% CI 0.174-0.468; p < 0.001) and by 97% (IRR 0.03, 95% CI 0.013-0.068; p < 0.001) after the second dose, compared with the perivaccine time. SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in the community (with a negligible vaccination rate) had a much lower decline: 2% (IRR 0.984, 95% CI 0.943-1.028; p 0.47) and 61% (IRR 0.390, 95% CI 0.375-0.406; p < 0.001) for equivalent periods. Adjusting for the decline in the community, the reduction in the incident rates among HCW were 73% (IRR 0.272, 95% CI 0.164-0.451 p < 0.001) after the first dose of the vaccine and 92% (IRR 0.176, 95% CI 0.033-0.174; p < 0.001) after the second dose. CONCLUSIONS: mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with a dramatic decline in new SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCW, even before the administration of the second dose of the vaccine.

Incidence and clinical profile of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients from Madrid region.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 related in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence is high but data reported vary significantly. Some studies show that up to half of the events are diagnosed early after admission. OBJECTIVES: To study symptomatic VTE incidence in acute COVID-19 hospitalized patients and to describe timing of VTE diagnosis. METHODS: Multicenter cohort of 5966 patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19. Multicenter Registry of 844 hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 and associated acute VTE. RESULTS: By the time of cohort data collection, 68 patients (1.14%) were still hospitalized, 19.8% had died, and 5.4% required ICU. During a median follow-up of 6 days (IQR, 4-12), 183 patients (3.07%; 95% CI, 2.64-3.55) presented a symptomatic VTE event. The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days in wards [2.3% (95% CI, 1.9-2.7), 3.6% (95% CI, 3.0-4.3), and 4.3% (95% CI, 3.5-5.1)] were similar to the ones reported in ICU [2.2% (95% CI, 1.0-4.4), 2.9% (95% CI, 1.5-5.3), and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.2-6.8)], but at 30 and 60 days were higher in ICU [6.9% (95% CI, 4.2-10.5), and 12.8% (95% CI, 8.1-18.5)] than in wards. Eighty-eight VTE events (48%) were diagnosed early, within 48 h of admission. VTE was not associated with death (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of symptomatic VTE in our COVID-19 cohort is consistent with that of other real-life studies recently published. Early VTE events are, along with COVID-19, the reason for admission rather than an in-hospital complication.